CLEAN MACHINE 2.0 • CLEAN RACING COMMAND CENTER
Clean Machine
A live rolling three-race clean-racing command center built around incident rate, race completion, zero-incident starts, movement and sustained racecraft.
CLEAN MACHINE LEADER
Austin Knight
1 incident in the rolling 3 • 92.9% laps completed
CLEAN DRIVER
Tyler Dalton
4 incidents in the rolling 3 • 99.4% laps completed
CLEAN DRIVER
Tyler Lemon
4 incidents in the rolling 3 • 94.2% laps completed
ROLLING THREE-RACE BOARD
Clean Machine Top 20
Cleaner is better • live rolling three-race viewSame rolling window as Chop's Most Wanted • 75% overall + 50% minimum in each race • lowest incidents wins
| Rank | Driver | Move | Incidents | Inc/Race | Inc/100 Laps | 0x Races | Laps | Completion | Series |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Austin Knight | — | 1 | 0.33 | 0.25 | 2 | 393 / 423 | 92.9% | Nationals |
Why #1?
0.33Incidents / race
1Total incidents
0.25Incidents / 100 laps
2Zero-incident races
92.9%Overall completion
85.9%Lowest single-race completion
Eligible because Austin Knight completed 92.9% overall and no individual start fell below 85.9%. Ranking breaks ties by total incidents, incidents per 100 laps, zero-incident races, completion, then laps completed. | |||||||||
| #2 | Tyler Dalton | — | 4 | 1.33 | 0.87 | 2 | 459 / 462 | 99.4% | NextGen |
Why #2?
1.33Incidents / race
4Total incidents
0.87Incidents / 100 laps
2Zero-incident races
99.4%Overall completion
98.5%Lowest single-race completion
Eligible because Tyler Dalton completed 99.4% overall and no individual start fell below 98.5%. Ranking breaks ties by total incidents, incidents per 100 laps, zero-incident races, completion, then laps completed. | |||||||||
| #3 | Tyler Lemon | — | 4 | 1.33 | 0.92 | 1 | 435 / 462 | 94.2% | NextGen |
Why #3?
1.33Incidents / race
4Total incidents
0.92Incidents / 100 laps
1Zero-incident races
94.2%Overall completion
75.9%Lowest single-race completion
Eligible because Tyler Lemon completed 94.2% overall and no individual start fell below 75.9%. Ranking breaks ties by total incidents, incidents per 100 laps, zero-incident races, completion, then laps completed. | |||||||||
| #4 | Jason Day | — | 12 | 2.0 | 1.42 | 3 | 848 / 885 | 95.8% | Nationals • NextGen |
Why #4?
2.0Incidents / race
12Total incidents
1.42Incidents / 100 laps
3Zero-incident races
95.8%Overall completion
86.5%Lowest single-race completion
Eligible because Jason Day completed 95.8% overall and no individual start fell below 86.5%. Ranking breaks ties by total incidents, incidents per 100 laps, zero-incident races, completion, then laps completed. | |||||||||
| #5 | Nate Biggart | — | 9 | 2.25 | 1.64 | 2 | 550 / 550 | 100.0% | Nationals • NextGen |
Why #5?
2.25Incidents / race
9Total incidents
1.64Incidents / 100 laps
2Zero-incident races
100.0%Overall completion
100.0%Lowest single-race completion
Eligible because Nate Biggart completed 100.0% overall and no individual start fell below 100.0%. Ranking breaks ties by total incidents, incidents per 100 laps, zero-incident races, completion, then laps completed. | |||||||||
| #6 | Brian Fine | — | 8 | 2.67 | 1.73 | 2 | 462 / 462 | 100.0% | NextGen |
Why #6?
2.67Incidents / race
8Total incidents
1.73Incidents / 100 laps
2Zero-incident races
100.0%Overall completion
100.0%Lowest single-race completion
Eligible because Brian Fine completed 100.0% overall and no individual start fell below 100.0%. Ranking breaks ties by total incidents, incidents per 100 laps, zero-incident races, completion, then laps completed. | |||||||||
| #7 | Joshua Seigfried | — | 10 | 3.33 | 2.62 | 1 | 381 / 462 | 82.5% | NextGen |
Why #7?
3.33Incidents / race
10Total incidents
2.62Incidents / 100 laps
1Zero-incident races
82.5%Overall completion
57.1%Lowest single-race completion
Eligible because Joshua Seigfried completed 82.5% overall and no individual start fell below 57.1%. Ranking breaks ties by total incidents, incidents per 100 laps, zero-incident races, completion, then laps completed. | |||||||||
| #8 | Robert Dudley | — | 11 | 3.67 | 2.47 | 0 | 446 / 462 | 96.5% | NextGen |
Why #8?
3.67Incidents / race
11Total incidents
2.47Incidents / 100 laps
0Zero-incident races
96.5%Overall completion
92.0%Lowest single-race completion
Eligible because Robert Dudley completed 96.5% overall and no individual start fell below 92.0%. Ranking breaks ties by total incidents, incidents per 100 laps, zero-incident races, completion, then laps completed. | |||||||||
| #9 | Brad Dove | — | 22 | 3.67 | 2.73 | 1 | 805 / 885 | 91.0% | Nationals • NextGen |
Why #9?
3.67Incidents / race
22Total incidents
2.73Incidents / 100 laps
1Zero-incident races
91.0%Overall completion
80.7%Lowest single-race completion
Eligible because Brad Dove completed 91.0% overall and no individual start fell below 80.7%. Ranking breaks ties by total incidents, incidents per 100 laps, zero-incident races, completion, then laps completed. | |||||||||
| #10 | Cameron Derieux | — | 13 | 4.33 | 2.81 | 0 | 462 / 462 | 100.0% | NextGen |
Why #10?
4.33Incidents / race
13Total incidents
2.81Incidents / 100 laps
0Zero-incident races
100.0%Overall completion
100.0%Lowest single-race completion
Eligible because Cameron Derieux completed 100.0% overall and no individual start fell below 100.0%. Ranking breaks ties by total incidents, incidents per 100 laps, zero-incident races, completion, then laps completed. | |||||||||
| #11 | Michael Strickland4 | — | 17 | 5.67 | 3.68 | 0 | 462 / 462 | 100.0% | NextGen |
Why #11?
5.67Incidents / race
17Total incidents
3.68Incidents / 100 laps
0Zero-incident races
100.0%Overall completion
100.0%Lowest single-race completion
Eligible because Michael Strickland4 completed 100.0% overall and no individual start fell below 100.0%. Ranking breaks ties by total incidents, incidents per 100 laps, zero-incident races, completion, then laps completed. | |||||||||
| #12 | Chris Justice | — | 17 | 5.67 | 3.82 | 1 | 445 / 462 | 96.3% | NextGen |
Why #12?
5.67Incidents / race
17Total incidents
3.82Incidents / 100 laps
1Zero-incident races
96.3%Overall completion
93.5%Lowest single-race completion
Eligible because Chris Justice completed 96.3% overall and no individual start fell below 93.5%. Ranking breaks ties by total incidents, incidents per 100 laps, zero-incident races, completion, then laps completed. | |||||||||
RANK HISTORY
Top-5 Trend Graphs
Recent Clean Machine snapshots • lower rank number is better.
HOW IT WORKS
